Some of the questions addressed:

• What do these decisions mean for the standard of review of arbitration awards?
  
  
• Is patently unreasonable being replaced by a standard of reasonableness?
  
  
• What is the court's current approach to the pragmatic and functional test?
  
  
• What does Lethbridge mean for the scope of arbitrators' remedial jurisdiction?
  
  
• When can compensation be substituted for reinstatement?
  
  
• Does Voice help explain the difference between 'express' and 'implied' restrictions on management rights?