| |
| |
| |
| |
|
 |
 |
Cleansing the Poisoned Workplace:
Reversing the effects of harassment and discrimination
Post-Conference Workshop |
 |
|
Presented
by Lancaster House
Friday, March 19, 2010
Full-Day
Interactive Session
9:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m.
Hyatt Regency Vancouver
655 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia |
| |
|
| |
| WORKSHOP LEADER |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Richard Hart
Arbitrator/Mediator |
| |
|
|
| SPEAKERS |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Keith Dormond
Detective, Domestic Violence and Criminal Harassment Unit, Vancouver Police Department
President, Canadian Association of Threat Assessment Professionals |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Joanna Gislason
Union/Employee Counsel
Caroline + Gislason Lawyers |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Fran Watters
Director of Faculty Relations
University of British Columbia |
|
| |
WORKSHOP TOPICS |
| |
A poisoned workplace can have dire consequences for employee morale and productivity, and can result in employee turnover, human rights complaints, and constructive dismissal lawsuits. Even after the triggering incident has been resolved, the negative effects of harassment and discrimination may persist. This workshop provides strategies for restoring reputations, good faith, and a culture of trust to a poisoned workplace and offers practical solutions to decrease the occurrence of and manage the risks associated with further incidents.
- Remedial Orders: What types of orders will tribunals issue to remedy a poisoned work environment? In what circumstances will a tribunal order mandatory human rights training for employees and management? The appointment of external investigators? A review and revision of workplace human rights policies? Monitoring by an external organization? Assistance with job training to aid an employee in achieving promotions that had been denied in the past as a result of discrimination? Can an employer's failure to remedy a poisoned work environment impact on the quantum of general damages awarded for harassment?
- Supervision by Tribunal: What continuing authority does the Tribunal have to supervise the implementation of its remedies? Can it recast its original orders to address an ongoing problem?
- Dealing with Parties to the Incident: What steps should employers take to ensure that victims receive the support they need? Should victims be provided with paid leave until any systemic remedies are implemented? What types of emotional and medical support should be considered? Should the employer provide an apology? Are victimized employees entitled to have restored their sick leave and other benefits that were used due to the harassment? Can employers require violent employees to receive medical assessments or treatment as a condition of continuing employment? How should they be reintegrated into the workplace so as to minimize the risk of another incident?
- Re-creating a Culture: How can employers ensure that employees suffering from the effects of a poisoned workplace are not afraid to voice their concerns? What are effective ways to raise awareness about harassment? What training programs are useful? What are the warning signs of workplace violence and/or harassment? How can the use of external workers, for example, mediators, counsellors, and investigators, be useful in dealing with the aftermath of harassment?
- Workplace Policies and Procedures: What are the benefits of involving employees in the creation of anti-harassment/-discrimination policies and procedures? What systems should be implemented to ensure that all reports of alleged incidents – regardless of whether voiced informally or in writing – enter the complaints process? What measures should anti-violence/harassment policies contain to ensure proper investigation and effective response? How often should the policies and procedures be reviewed? How should the effectiveness of the policies be monitored?
- Physical Environment: How can the physical layout of the workplace (e.g. signs, locks, lighting, electronic surveillance) impact on the risk of violence and harassment in the workplace? What steps can be taken to minimize these risks?
- Administrative Practices: How can administrative practices (e.g. hours of operation, staffing procedures) impact on the risk of workplace violence and harassment? What types of modifications should be considered?
|
|
   |
|
 |
| |
| |
| |
| More
2010 Conferences |
| |
| Top |
| ©
Copyright 2010 Lancaster House. All Rights Reserved. |
|
|
|
|
|
|